Make data-driven decisions to improve longevity

A community hub for entrepreneurs, freelancers, and student initiatives.

Categories

Co-working, Collaboration, Community,

Product Gallery

Reasons for Shutdown

No Financial Support

The main reason Pluto was shutdown.

Pluto had no financial support from any organizations or investors; so they relied on self-funding.

Failed Fundraising

Launched a crowdfunding campaign but did not reach their goal.

Ten months on to their launch, the company launched a crowdfunding campaign on the Lebanese platform Zoomaal, but having reached only 6% of their aim, it closed in 2015.
The lack of funding and the difficulty to harmonise their social scope with the financial requirements resulted in a bad fit.

Direct Competitors and Similar Companies

Note: Direct competitors are defined by similarity score of more than 40%, while similar companies are defined by similarity score of less than 40%

No.	Image	Name	Similarity score	Description	Industry	Categories	Location	Ownership status	Entity type	Stage of development	Transactional model type	Defensibility moats	Last financing round	Total raised	Post-money valuation	Last financing date	No. of funding round(s)	No. of investors	Investors	Total revenue	Market capitalization	No. of investments	No. of acquisitions	No. of board seats taken	Competition	Management	No. of employees	Company reputation	Contact info	Operational status	Operational duration	Shutdown date	Founded date	Legal name	Former legal name(s)	Ticker
1.		Saigon Hub	13.3%	Connected freelancers, entrepreneurs, small business owners, digital nomads, and early- stage investors.	Professional Services	Education, Consulting, Communities, Co-working	Vietnam	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	Inactive	-	-	2013	-	-	-
2.		Zirtual	13.3%	Provided virtual assistants to busy professionals.	Professional Services	Collaborative Consumption, Outsourcing, Collaboration	United States	-	-	-	-	-	M&A	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	100-250	-	-	Inactive	-	-	2011	-	-	-

Investors

No.	Image	Name	Investor type	Description	Location	Preferred investment stage(s)	Stages invested in	Assets under management (AUM)	Investment range	Investment sweet spot	Preferred investment focus	Preferred investment geography	No. of investments	No. of lead investments	No. of follow-on investments	No. of co-investments	Portfolio companies	No. of exits	Total exit value	No. of failed investments	Loss on investments	No. of acquisitions	No. of board seats taken	No. of funds	Limited partners	Co-investors	No. of partners	Partners	No. of employees	Management	Board members	Founders	Investor reputation	Contact info	Entity type	Legal name	Former legal name(s)	Founded date	Ticker
-		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Leadership

No.	Image	Name	Previous designation	Previous company	Previous biography	Previous profile type	Previous location	Experience	Education	Reputation	Current company	Current designation	Current biography	Current profile type	Current location	No. of investments	No. of exits	Total exit value	No. of board seats taken	Contact info
1.		Mohamed Ezz El-din	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
2.		Hosam Mahmoud	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Funding

No.	Financing date	Financing round	Total amount raised	Post-money valuation	Financial viability	Fundraising target amount	Remaining target amount	Financing type	No. of investors	Board seats	Lead investors	Entity type	Financing status
-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-